Analytics Platform Questions

Why Modernize To PySpark?

Apache Spark and PySpark (the Python API for Spark) is a fast and general-purpose cluster computing platform. It offers an open source, wide range data processing engine with revealing development API’s. Scalable & fault tolerant, it’s become the defacto analytics platform in the market, with performance and capabilities that far surpass that of traditional platforms (SAS, IBM etc.). Apache Spark offers 100X+ greater data processing performance and is open source, hosted at the vendor-independent Apache Software Foundation. Most of the global Cloud Service Providers use Spark to handle big data in their cloud. Simply put, there is no easier migration to Cloud than with Spark.

Performance may have netted Spark an initial following among the big data and analytics crowd, but the ecosystem and interoperability is what continues to drive broader adoption of Spark today. Apache Spark is the most modern unified data science platform available with the ability to run models and analytics programs 100’s of times faster over legacy systems like SAS, MapReduce, or R, and it can scale to any size of data.

Who is using PySpark?

Most of the Fortune 100, 500 and 1000 companies, including General Motors, Capital One, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, General Electric, BMW, Uber, Toronto Dominion Bank, HSBC, Bloomberg, etc, use Spark for its built-in libraries for data access, streaming, data integration, graph processing and advanced analytics and machine learning. This immensely performant, unified data science platform is being widely adopted globally with significant advantages being promoted by all in open source chat rooms and conferences.

Why not convert to other languages / platforms? Why just PySpark?

For decades, SAS users have tried to migrate to a variety of other technologies. Inevitably these projects fail or become far more complicated than initially planned. SAS is a very rich language, with broad and unique set of features. Many of the concepts in SAS code can’t be easily replicated in other tools such as databases, Python, R, SPSS, etc. These tools all have severe limitations in terms of flexibility, coding constructs, scalability or performance.

PySpark is the only platform that meets and exceeds SAS’ language capabilities in every respect, and is the industry standard analytics platform.

We’ve heard that PySpark is much faster than legacy SAS. Just how much faster is it?

While benchmarks will differ, PySpark truly shines when operating on larger datasets. It’s parallel-first engine is far more efficient than legacy SAS’ single threaded single machine model. We’ve had some processes run over 1,000x faster on similar hardware, but 100x is more typical. On very small datasets, the performance advantage diminishes due to the additional overhead of Spark’s parallelization and optimization algorithms.

We don’t have a Spark cluster or “Big Data”, but want to modernize and get off SAS. Can you help?

PySpark is the most scalable analytics platform in existence, scaling to clusters of 1,000’s of machines. While this scalability is awesome, some believe PySpark is only a “Big Data” technology. The reality is that PySpark is easy to deploy on a single machine or small server. If you already have Python, simply “pip install pyspark” to install the necessary components to run it in local mode. You still gain the benefits of running a high performance parallel engine, even on a laptop.

We have teams that use Python Pandas, do you convert to that?

To maximize performance and scalability, we only convert to native PySpark DataFrame code. The Python Pandas API is supported as an API on PySpark, so your existing Pandas based data teams will feel right at home.

Is it possible to convert SAS to R?

The R language has gained some support over the years, especially within academic and statistician communities. For this reason, many believe it could be a good replacement for SAS, which also had strong support by those communities. Unfortunately R was built by and built for academic statisticians, essentially becoming a very niche domain specific language (DSL).

Experts agree that with R, little attention has been paid to proper software engineering practices within the community, and so consistency and maintainability are major issues. It also lacks many of the features and qualities necessary for an enterprise replacement to SAS. The overwhelming trend is to move away from niche DSL’s, and to leverage the power and generality of Python along with purpose built libraries such as PySpark, SKLearn, SciPy, statsmodels, etc.

What products support PySpark?

What versions of PySpark do you support? Are there other requirements?

Migration Process Questions

What is a brute force migration?

We define brute force as the manual process of translating proprietary SAS code into PySpark code. Human’s manually performing the work. This type of approach is typically taken by large enterprises hiring or assigning work to corporate resources, or large integrators spreading the process across many hired individuals.

What are Pay-and-Pray conversion tools?

Over the years WiseWithData SPROCKET has inspired a number of copycat tool vendors. They ask you to Pay for the tool first and Pray that it will work for your code. They often sell their wares to less reputable systems integrators, who want to claim they have automation. In reality, these systems integrators just ship your code off to low-cost, low-skilled off-shore sweatshops to be manually converted. If they truly have automation, why do they need low cost labour? They will also bill you regardless of quality or outcome, which is wrong. Reputable vendors only bill on validated quality results.

These tool vendors also use low-skilled low-cost labour internally, labour who don’t understand the source or target platform. Their generated code is often so messy, inconsistent and verbose its difficult to even understand how it relates to the original SAS code. One recent fly-by-night vendor, constantly has to lie about its capabilities. Despite the lies and hyped claims, none will guarantee feature coverage, and more importantly they will not even disclose what isn’t covered by their product. They will ask for money upfront, with no guarantee about success or quality.

How much faster is automation?

Our automation is easily 100x faster than a brute force approach. We’ve already solved many of the hard issues that people encounter when trying to convert code in a brute force way.

Anecdotes from our customers put the speed of manual conversion at ~200 ± 200 lines per day for a pair of programmers. That’s right, some days 0 lines will be produced due to complex technical challenges. Our analysts using automation are typically producing over 10,000 lines of code per day.

How do I ensure a vendor is using a scalable and automated migration solution?

The best way to ensure both the quality and speed of the automation is quite simply to put it to the test. Ask vendors to convert 2,500 lines of complex SAS code in 24 hours or less. If they refuse, they can’t deliver, or they deliver but the code is really messy and inaccurate, you know they do not have a scalable and automated solution.

Over the past 9 years, every time WiseWithData has been in such a high-speed bake-off with other vendors, it has won 100% of the time.

How does automation reduce risk and exposure?

Because automation has very little human intervention there is significantly less risk in code and IP being exposed or openly shared by humans. Further, the output is consistent, unlike a manual approach where every person has a unique way of coding, the end result is accurate code. Code consistency is also beneficial to those working with it daily, as they will learn from the format and calls much more quickly reducing the learning curve and increasing adoption, while allowing them an opportunity to grow their skills.

We also hear feedback that human “turn over” in the manual conversion process is as high as 30%. Needing to switch gears, bring new people up to speed, and resolve issues left behind by those moving on elongates the migration process. People become bored with manually converting code daily for months at a time, leading them to find alternative opportunities or even shifting focus to other projects.

I’ve looked at other solutions claiming to be automated, but was disappointed. What differentiates the WiseWithData approach?

We hear that from our customers too, and the results of “bake-off’s” performed by our customers lead us to understand the code we generate has far better coverage, is way more accurate, leverages industry best practices, and works without the need for manual intervention.

Having years of experience converting millions of lines of code, we have an unmatched depth of experience, which is incorporated into our automation. Of course, there’s always very complex code that we apply our SAS & PySpark experts to enhance the final output, improve performance, and integrate within the customers unique environment.

We’ve been told some SAS processes cannot run outside of SAS. What processes do you support?

SAS is a 50 year old technology, with many different components, many which have been acquired over the years. Of course we can’t convert every conceivable process built in a SAS product into PySpark, but we do have broad support & experience converting processes from the most popular components including:

• Base and Macro

• Stat & ETS

• Graph

• Database Access Engines

• EGuide

• EMiner Scoring models

• DI Studio

• SPDE & SPDS

• Grid, Share & Connect

We are looking to migrate over a long period of time. Is your service flexible?

Yes. In addition to our SPROCKET migration packages, we also offer on on-demand service that can be used to convert code at any time. Please contact us to find out more.

Out tasking code conversion has cost us significantly more due to change fees and scope creep. Is this the same case with your delivery model?

Our business is built on the understanding of both SAS and PySpark which is a unique value add according to our customers. Without the large and diverse human presence in the code conversion process, automation allows us to focus on delivery of the output. It also allows us to focus on the any challenges that arise and put our expertise to use.

Our service is priced per the scope and documented understanding of the task. We are SLA driven and our goal is to ensure accuracy and deliver identical outcomes in the new platform. Our commitment to our customers is that we do not charge change fees, and work to ensure you are satisfied with the outcomes.

You can count on WiseWithData to deliver within the committed statement of work without going beyond the time frame or surprising extra costs.

I have a few hundred lines of complex code SAS code. Can you convert this for me?

As much as we would love to assist everyone on their modernization journey, this isn’t always feasible. Our solution is designed to work for enterprise organizations to convert large amounts of code quickly and efficiently.

Our entry package starts at 10,000 lines of code delivered in 5 business days, and we are comfortable working with millions of lines.

We offer services to supplement your brute force approach and full-on conversion services. If you have a need to convert a few thousand lines of code or more, we’re happy to work with you to scope and price your project.